For .NET hiring in Georgia, define the runtime and application context before searching. A modern product team may need .NET 10, ASP.NET Core, cloud, testing and distributed-systems experience; an enterprise migration may instead need deep .NET Framework, SQL Server, Windows integration and staged modernization skills. The strongest brief separates those needs rather than asking for a generic “senior .NET developer”.
Start with the application, not the language label.
“C# developer” is too broad for a useful senior search. A payments API, a desktop enterprise application, a high-throughput event platform and an Azure migration all use the same language but require different evidence. Define the runtime, architecture, deployment model, database, cloud dependencies, security constraints and ownership expected in the first 90 days.
For a new web platform, the brief may emphasise ASP.NET Core, APIs, distributed systems, containers and observability. For a mature enterprise estate, interoperability, Windows services, SQL Server, .NET Framework and incremental modernization may be more important.
- Application type and business criticality
- Current and target .NET versions
- Azure/AWS/on-premises environment
- Database and messaging stack
- Testing, CI/CD and observability expectations
- Legacy integration or migration scope
Use current .NET support status as part of technical due diligence.
Microsoft’s current support policy lists .NET 10 as an active long-term-support release. .NET 8 is also LTS but reaches end of support in November 2026. That does not mean every .NET 8 application must be rewritten immediately, but employers should know whether a candidate is joining a stable supported platform, a planned upgrade or a legacy estate with technical debt.
A senior engineer should be able to explain upgrade risk, package compatibility, test coverage, deployment constraints and the difference between a framework-version change and an architecture rewrite.
Define the .NET role family before sourcing.
A productive .NET team usually contains more than interchangeable backend developers. The role mix depends on whether the client owns a product, platform, integration layer or modernization programme.
- Backend/API engineer — ASP.NET Core, domain logic, APIs, messaging
- Full-stack .NET engineer — backend plus React/Angular/Blazor as required
- Cloud/platform-oriented .NET engineer — Azure, containers, identity, observability
- Integration engineer — enterprise APIs, queues, data contracts and third-party systems
- Technical lead/architect — architecture, migration sequence, engineering standards and reviews
- QA automation engineer — API, integration and regression automation
Assess .NET engineers with production-shaped evidence.
A strong assessment does not require trivia about language syntax. Ask the candidate to explain a system they actually worked on: request flow, data model, failure modes, deployment, security boundaries, performance bottlenecks and a technical decision they would change today.
Then use a small role-relevant exercise. For a backend engineer, that might be an API change with validation, persistence and tests. For a lead, use a system-design discussion around migration, resilience or service boundaries.
- Can they reason about async/await and concurrency in real services?
- Can they design testable application boundaries?
- Do they understand authentication/authorization rather than only framework configuration?
- Can they explain database performance and transaction choices?
- Can they operate code through CI/CD and production diagnostics?
Treat Azure as a capability area, not a checkbox.
Many .NET environments use Microsoft Azure, but “Azure experience” can mean very different things. Clarify whether you need application deployment, infrastructure-as-code, identity, Functions, Service Bus, SQL, Kubernetes, monitoring or platform governance.
For embedded product engineers, enough cloud literacy to own their service may be sufficient. For a platform-heavy role, cloud architecture and operational depth should be assessed separately.
Choose the engagement model around ownership.
A permanent .NET hire makes sense when the role is stable and belongs inside the client organisation. Staff augmentation fits when the client already has engineering leadership and needs added capacity. A dedicated team can fit when several complementary roles need to operate as one delivery unit.
HomeOffice.ge can also support the local operating layer in Tbilisi—onboarding, workspace/hub coordination, local people operations and team continuity—when the engagement grows beyond one person.
Build the interview sequence before contacting candidates.
Senior candidates are lost when five interviewers independently repeat the same screening questions. Decide what each stage proves: profile evidence, technical depth, architecture, team collaboration and final commercial alignment. Keep the process short enough to respect employed candidates.
- Stage 1: 30-minute technical/context screen
- Stage 2: role-relevant technical interview or exercise
- Stage 3: team/leadership conversation
- Stage 4: offer or engagement alignment
When to build a complete .NET team in Tbilisi.
A team model becomes more useful when the client needs multiple engineers over a meaningful period and wants a repeatable operating rhythm rather than repeated individual hiring. Start with the product ownership boundary, then add roles in the order that removes bottlenecks.
A typical sequence may be a lead/senior backend engineer, additional backend/full-stack capacity, QA automation and DevOps/platform support. The right sequence is product-specific.
Frequently asked questions
Is .NET 10 the current LTS version in 2026?
Yes. Microsoft’s current support policy lists .NET 10 as an active LTS release. .NET 8 is also LTS but reaches end of support in November 2026.
Can HomeOffice.ge source legacy .NET Framework experience?
Yes, when the requirement is defined clearly. Legacy enterprise modernization often needs engineers who understand both the old runtime/integration constraints and the target modern .NET architecture.
Should a .NET hire also know Azure?
Only if Azure is part of the role. Define the actual services and ownership expected instead of treating “Azure” as a generic checkbox.
Can we build a complete .NET team in Tbilisi?
Yes, where the required roles can be sourced and the client defines a stable ownership model. Team composition should follow product responsibilities rather than a fixed staffing template.
Sources and further reading
Statistics and market context were checked against the following sources. Operational recommendations are HomeOffice.ge editorial guidance and should be adapted to each company, project and jurisdiction.